Valjean Clark

Right knee medical history

Last updated on

This post is intended for orthopedic doctors and physical therapists.

Short version

This is as short a summary as I could make without losing any important information.

All MRI reports and post-op notes

All my MRI reports and post-op notes are available here.

The image below shows a side-by-side MRI comparison of my good knee’s ACL and my right knee’s ACL. The anterior placement of the graft, bowing, and impingement are all visible.

Left/right ACL comparison

Full version

I tore my ACL skiing in January 2019. ACL reconstruction surgery was soon scheduled for March 2019 at Kaiser in San Francisco. For the 2 months before the surgery, I did “prehab” to keep the knee and leg strong. I was pain free at this time.

I was given a choice between a hamstring graft and a BTB patellar graft. The surgeon advised me to do the BTB patellar graft because it is the “gold standard” and the graft is stronger than the hamstring graft, and hence more resistant to re-tear.

As soon as I started PT exercises after my ACLR surgery, I started experiencing pain and stiffness that has stayed with me to this day. The pain presents under and slightly below my patella, and it is strongest in the ~20º arc leading up to full knee extension. Consequently, it is easy to trigger with simple PT exercises like quad sets and banded terminal knee extensions. Kaiser PTs encouraged me to “push through the pain”, but it was clear my experience was different than the others in my group PT sessions. The pain was blocking me from being able to perform movements correctly.

After initially regaining extension, I started to lose extension a few months into PT. Because of this and the strong patellofemoral pain I was experiencing, while my rehab stalled. After another MRI, we discovered that a cyclops lesion had developed. Another surgery was performed in December 2019, after which I regained extension. The hope was that this, combined with some debridement, would reduce pain, but it did not.

I spoke with several different surgeons at Kaiser about my situation, and they all said 1) that BTB patellar graft can result in unresolvable patellofemoral pain and 2) given my cartilage damage, I could consider a cartilage restoration surgery like OATS.

Disappointed with the quality of Kaiser’s PT department and skeptical that more surgery would fix my problems, I left Kaiser to gain access to a broader set of institutions, PTs, and doctors. I found some PTs who treated my condition as they would general patellofemoral pain, which allowed me to restore some strength and function. This envelope of function approach instructed me to keep pain 3/10 or below and slowly build up strength while avoiding any movements that cause spikes in pain. This allowed me to regain a lot of muscle mass, and it also made it possible to return to hiking and cycling. These activities were still not pain free, but I could do them at a seemingly manageable low level of pain.

I tried reintroducing running at multiple points, but it would always lead to large spikes in pain that took weeks to recover from. Over time, my pain levels kept increasing with activities like hiking and weightlifting. I had an MRI done and found that the cartilage damage to my patella had expanded to become a 2cm defect. I had several different surgeons look at this MRI (Brian Gilmer, Drew Lansdown, and Ken Akizuki), and all 3 mentioned MACI as an alternative to OATS for cartilage restoration.

With pain worsening, I decided I needed to try another surgery, and it seemed like I had consensus that MACI was worth a try. (Aside: I learned recently that not all surgeons are as optimistic about MACI’s effectiveness, particularly for a large patellar defect, so it seems I just had a sample of surgeons biased toward MACI.) I had the MACI graft implanted in Sep 2023.

A few months into the PT for MACI, it became clear that it did not have any impact on the pain. All the same exercises involving terminal knee extension still hurt. Walking on flat surfaces still hurt. Discouraged but still determined, I spent the following year rehabbing using the same envelope of function approach as before.

Given all the focus on cartilage, my PT suggested that I could pay out-of-pocket for an MRI of my good knee to get a better idea of the state of the cartilage in my good knee as a baseline. This ended up being very interesting - the MRI showed that I have similar cartilage damage in the same area on my good knee. Between the MACI and this MRI, I became quite skeptical that cartilage damage is the cause of my pain, since cartilage damage does not always present with pain.

In March 2025, I was now 1.5 years since the MACI surgery. The envelope of function PT approach had allowed me to return to some cycling and hiking, but pain levels were higher than before. PT exercises that were not painful in 2024 started becoming painful. Walking on flat surfaces is much more painful that it used to be, sometimes even 6/10 pain, which is very difficult to live with. With some reluctance, I decided I need to talk to orthopedic doctors. I wanted a fresh perspective, so I set up appointments with the best doctors and surgeons in my area (San Francisco Bay Area): Keith Chan, Brian Feeley, Lesley Anderson, Seth Sherman, and Ed Shin.

I had x-ray and MRI done. The MRI report contained some new findings:

  1. the tibial tunnel of the graft is positioned anterior to Blumensaat line
  2. the ACL graft is bowing
  3. evidence of fat pad impingement
  4. my tibia is anteriorly translated on my femur

Opinions from surgeons and PTs

As of June 2025, I am in the process of talking to surgeons and PTs about my situation. Below are my summaries of my interactions so far.

Keith Chan

Upon seeing the MRI and understanding that I’ve already tried managing it conservatively, Keith suggested ACL revision. The thinking is that the anterior graft placement is putting more pressure on my infrapatellar fat pain, which is why it’s so easy for me to trigger painful episodes.

He said my ACL graft is a bit loose based on both the physical exam and the MRI. He also thinks the graft is impinging slightly, which could explain why the ACL has loosened despite me never returning sport since the initial ACLR six years ago.

Keith also said that the MACI surgery I underwent was a “long shot” for treating my pain.

Brian Feeley

Brian wants to gather more information about where the pain is coming from before making any kind of recommendation. He set up a follow-on appointment at the beginning of July for an ultrasound-guided lidocaine injection into my fat pad. The idea is that I will have 1-2 hour window to try doing squats and other movements that cause me pain so that we can know if the pain is coming from inside my knee or outside my knee.

I may also be able to assess if my knee feels like it is giving out. He agreed that my ACL is somewhat loose, but he said that only I can know if it is causing instability.

He said Keith’s theory is plausible, but he also said he’s seen ACL grafts with bone tunnels in similar positions to mine where the patient is pain-free and returned to sport successfully.

Seth Sherman

Similar to Brian, Seth pointed out that while my ACL placement is not ideal, it is “in the zip code” and he has patients who returned to sport with an ACL in this location.

Seth ordered full leg length, weight-bearing x-rays to compare how I am putting weight through my knees and to compare the joint space. Thankfully, he said both look good.

Seth said that cartilage damage and scar tissue are the likely causes of pain in my knee, but that there is no clear intervention he would recommend yet with the information he has. He recommended an exploratory arthroscopy to learn more about the state of my knee, i.e. where cartilage needs to be plugged and how much scar tissue is present in/around the fat pad.

I have become skeptical of cartilage damage as a primary driver of pain in my knee, as it doesn’t track very well with my symptoms. Also, I have extensive cartilage damage in the same area of my good knee, and I am pain-free in that knee.

Seth said that doing the MACI without TTO/TTL does not really make sense. There is no point patching cartilage if the patient is just going to wear the area down again.

Lesley Anderson

Lesley says there are three possible causes of my pain: nerve, chondral, and fat pad. Nerve pain causes a burning sensation, which I do not experience, so that leaves chondral and fat pad.

She is retired, but generally recommends finding a doctor who is a good diagnostician. Brian Feeley seems like such a doctor.

She said my options are injections like PRP or cortisone shots, or surgery. She said the goal of the surgery would be to carefully clear up scar tissue in the fat pad. Surgeons differ widely in their ability to do that well (she said Dr. Steadman was really good at this but he passed away).

Her advice pairs nicely with Brian Feeley’s plan.

Just like Seth Sherman, Lesley also said that doing the MACI without TTO/TTL was a strange choice. She said she would only do that in young patients who had acute patellar cartilage trauma, i.e. a divet of cartilage gets damaged from a fall. In older patients where the cartilage damaged is caused by wear-and-tear, there is no point patching cartilage if the patient is just going to wear the area down again.

(Aside: It’s fair to say at this point that Brian Gilmer’s choice of MACI for medial patellar cartilage damage was incorrect. The area was not a pain driver in my knee, so it was the wrong diagnosis, and even if it was correct, it didn’t make sense to do it without TTO/TTL to correct the maltracking that naturally leads to the medial patellar cartilage wear.)

Ed Shin

Ed was focused on the cartilage damage in my knee and the MRI signal showing sub-chondral bone swelling in my patella and tibia. He said to consider an injection to see if I can bring down the inflammation in my knee. He said to be wary of cortisone injections with the presence of MACI cartilage in the knee, so he recommended that I try hyaluronic acid first.

Ed said the ACL felt fine upon physical exam.

Given that other doctors have emphasized the fat pad as the more likely pain source, I asked him if the cause of my pain could be fat pad pain, and he said it was possible. He said patellofemoral pain and fat pain pain can occur together, and that the onset of one can lead to the other. This reminded me of my appointments with Lesley Anderson and Brian Feeley who both stressed the importance of finding the right diagnosis. If I don’t treat the root cause of my pain and inflammation, I may end up treating a symptom.

Claire Robertson

TBD. June 16 appointment.

Diagnostics

Ultimately, I am trying to resolve pain to normalize function, so I need to have a clear understanding of the cause of the pain before any further intervention, conservative or surgical.

The anterior placement of the graft is new information to me. Reading about it lines up with my lived experience and symptoms much better than general post-B2B graft patellofemoral pain. Namely:

After learning about the anterior graft placement, I was initially hopeful that I had found the smoking gun, the cause of all my pain and complications so far. And it indeed was likely the cause of my cyclops lesion. However, most surgeons I spoke to said that, while not optimal, the placement was no far off that they think this is the root cause of all my problems. It is possibly a contributor to fat pad pain. So, not a clear smoking gun.

Unfortunately, it’s not quite this simple. Because I did B2B patellar autograft and patellar cartilage MACI, I have had two large traumas to my infrapatellar fat pad. The cyclops lesion also caused damage to my fat pad. The fat pad is highly enervated and a likely pain driver for me. It’s possible that most or all of my pain is related to fat pad scarring. It’s possible that the MACI further disrupted an already painful fat pad and that there is new fat pad scarring that has led to the bad outcome I have had.

I have two more appointments that should help with building confidence in a diagnosis and treatment plan. I’m seeing a patellofemoral pain expert, Claire Robertson, and I have the ultrasound-guided lidocaine injection into my fat pad that Brian Feeley set up. Between the two of these, I hope to have a clearer idea of how much of my pain is fat pad pain and how much is chondral pain. I like Brian Feeley and am hopeful that he can be a good partner to me in figuring out how to resolve my issues.

If I do end up needing surgical intervention to clear up scar tissue, I will need to decide if I want to operate on the ACL. The idea that the anterior graft placement has been a fat pad irritant is compelling, but knowing that people can have a similarly positioned graft and not experience pain makes me hesitate. An ACL revision is a big operation with its own risks.

6 years of pain

It’s now been over 6 years since the initial ACL surgery and subsequent complications. I cannot express in words how difficult this has been. Assuming I even partially restore normal function in the coming years, I’ll have spent a decade of my life on this. It’s likely I’ll be dealing with this in one form or another for the rest of my life.

Onward.